The effects of a cow's diet on E. coli levels

Researchers from Kansas State University have concluded that feedlots containing cattle that are fed distiller's grain, a byproduct of ethanol production, have an increased incidence of E. coli O157:H7 - a toxic form of E. coli that causes human illness.  T.G. Nagaraja, a professor of diagnostic medicine and pathobiology at Kansas State's College of Veterinary Medicine, and Jim Drouillard, a professor of animal sciences at Kansas State, conducted research to determine whether diet influences the number of bacteria in an animal's gut.

An Associated Press article regarding the new research focused on the need for further research now that the increase has been identified:

Research in the next few years will focus on finding out the reasons for the prevalence of the bacteria in cattle fed a distiller's grain diet. Nagaraja said it could be related to changes in the animal's gut from the diet. The byproduct may also provide a nutrient for the E. coli bacteria.

Domer said more work needs to be done to see if the prevalence of E. coli contamination can be controlled by providing cattle that are fed distiller's grain with other feed sources.

"The research is still early and probably needs more work so we can know how to control the situation," Domer said.

Feeding cattle distiller's grain is a big economic advantage for ethanol plants," Nagaraja said. "We realize we can't tell cattle producers, 'Don't feed distiller's grain.' What we want to do is not only understand the reasons why 0157 increases, but also find a way to prevent that from happening."

E. coli O157:H7 bacteria is believed to mostly live in the intestines of cattle, but has also been found in the intestines of chickens, deer, sheep, and pigs. E. coli O157:H7 does not make the animals that carry it ill; the animals are merely the reservoir for the bacteria.

Meat typically becomes contaminated with E. coli O157:H7 during the slaughtering process, when the contents of an animal's intestines and feces are allowed to come into contact with the carcass. Unless the carcass is sanitized, the E. coli bacteria are eventually mixed into the meat as it is ground. Because the bacteria is mixed into the meat during the grinding process, and is not just on the surface, thorough cooking (to160 degrees) is required to prevent E. coli O157:H7 poisoning from consumption of ground beef. Contaminated meat looks and smells normal, and although the number of organisms required to cause an infection is not known, it is suspected to be very small.

A 2003 study on the prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in livestock at 29 county and 3 large state agricultural fairs in the United States found that E. coli O157:H7 could be isolated from 13.8% of beef cattle, 5.9% of dairy cattle, 3.6% of pigs, 5.2% of sheep, and 2.8% of goats. Over seven percent of pest fly pools also tested positive for E. coli O157:H7.

$5.5 million to go toward E. coli research

Yesterday, the USDA announced that it has awarded $5.5 million to researchers who are working to determine the risk factors and prevention measures for E. coli O157:H7 contamination in fresh produce.  The funding will be distributed as follows:

USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSRES) are providing the funding to ARS researcher Rob Mandrell and his collaborators at the University of California to continue their research in the Central Valley of California. Over the next three years ARS will contribute $5 million and CSREES will contribute $470,999. In 2006, CSREES awarded Mandrell and colleague Robert Atwill at University of California-Davis $1.2 million to do research in the Salinas Valley.

Mandrell will address where E. coli O157:H7 originates, how it survives on the plant, and what factors lead to an increase in produce-related outbreaks. Potential risk factors include animals, land practices, packing and processing processes and wildlife.

Additionally, the project will feature workshops and publications to educate the animal operators, natural resource managers and the public about animal diseases that can be transferred to humans, how animal waste can contaminate water sources, and beneficial management practices for maintaining and improving water runoff quality.

For more information about the funding, visit the USDA website.

Laser system offers cheaper, faster pathogen detection

Food Production Daily

28/07/2006- A pathogen detecting system that uses scattered laser light can cut costs and speed up safety checks for food processors, researchers developing the technology claim.

New hygiene regulations brought in the by the EU at the start of this year impose tougher and more stringent testing requirements on food processors, making it necessary for them to do the job as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Researchers at Purdue University say they have developed a new system that analyses scattered laser light to quickly identify bacteria for applications in medicine, food processing and homeland security at one-tenth the cost of conventional technologies.

The technique, called Bacteria Rapid Detection Using Optical Scattering Technology, works by shining a laser through a petri dish containing bacterial colonies growing in a nutrient medium.

A major motivation for the research is to reduce the time it takes for industry to identify harmful organisms in food processing. Scientists in food-processing plants routinely grow cultures to test for dangerous pathogens, said Paul Robinson, one of the researchers of the project at the university's Bindley Bioscience Centre.

"The dairy industry, for example, grows bacteria on petri dishes to make sure products are safe, but industry is trying to develop technologies that will very quickly identify organisms," Robinson said. "The same sort of thing holds true for clinical microbiology and other laboratories. With our light-scattering method, it takes less than five minutes to identify harmful organisms after they have grown in a petri dish. The analysis is faster than any other methods in existence, and it's simple."

The machine bounces particles of light, called photons, off of a bacterial colony. The pattern of scattered light is projected onto a screen behind the petri dish.

The "light-scatter pattern" is recorded with a digital camera and analyzed with sophisticated software to identify the types of bacteria growing in the colonies.

The work was started by Arun Bhunia, a professor of food microbiology and Daniel Hirleman, head of Purdue's mechanical engineering school. The findings are published this month in the Journal of Biomedical Optics.

Hirleman adapted some of his previous work to develop new types of sensors that analyzing light scattering off objects for applications such as detecting impurities on silicon wafers in computer chip manufacturing and measuring the size and speed of fuel droplets in jet engines.

"We adapted some ideas from that research to build a scatterometer for food safety, and now we're using the second generation of that instrument," Hirleman stated in a press release.

A critical part of the technique was made possible by adapting a mathematical method created in 1934 by Dutch physicist Fritz Zernike, who created a set of mathematical "descriptors" subsequently called radial Zernike polynomials. These descriptors can be used to analyze how light-wave patterns are distorted after passing through lenses having complex flaws or aberrations.

Individual bacterial colonies growing in a petri dish also distort light passing through them, just as a lens changes light-wave patterns.

"Therefore, we can treat the colonies as lenses and use Zernike polynomials," Rajwa said.

Factors such as the shape of bacteria, their refractive indexes - or how much they bend light - the types of substances secreted by a particular bacterium and the distance between individual bacteria in a colony, all contribute to how a colony distorts light.

The procedure identifies a bacterial colony by comparing an image of its scatter pattern against a template that contains 120 features described by Zernike polynomials.

"A good analogy is the method used by law enforcement to identify a person's face using specialized recognition software," Rajwa stated. "You could describe the face as being made up of a combination of geometric shapes, like ovals, squares and triangles, but each face has a unique blend of these shapes. We did something similar. We reduced complicated scatter patterns to 120 numbers based on Zernike polynomials."

The reduced collection of numbers describes how well the colony fits the template, and then pattern recognition software is used to classify the bacteria.

"One of the most important developments is being able to convert images to numbers, which makes it possible to classify the patterns," Rajwa said. "We are able to take images and convert them to numbers that uniquely describe every picture."

The researchers used the new system to classify six species of listeria, only one of which is a dangerous food-borne pathogen for humans.

"If you have a mixture of different listeria, you would like to know which is the one that can kill you," Rajwa said. "We took pictures of the scatter patterns from different listeria, and we were able to classify all of them accurately."

The scientists used to system to accurately identify other types of bacterial colonies, including salmonella, vibrio, E. coli and bacillus.

"We were able to classify bacterial colonies with greater than a 90 per cent probability of being correct, which is as good as you could do with equipment costing more than $100,000, " Rajwa stated. "And, unlike conventional systems, our method is 100 percent non-invasive, which means we can carry out the procedure without staining, manipulating or killing the biological samples."

Rajwa says the technology does not require complicated lab equipment. A system could be designed so that it wouldn't require someone with a doctoral degree to operate.

"The whole beauty of the system is you don't invade the biological environment that you want to measure," Rajwa stated. "If you are working with stem cells, you don't want to stain them to see if they are stem cells. You want to be able to look at colonies on a petri dish without touching the colonies, without staining or destroying the colonies."

A mass-produced system based on the technology would consist of inexpensive, off-the-shelf hardware, such as red lasers and low-resolution digital cameras available at consumer electronics stores, and likely would cost less than $1,000, the researchers calculate.

The research has recently received funding from the US Department of Agriculture through Purdue's Centre for Food Safety Engineering.

The researchers say further work will include research to develop a graphical user interface.

"Now it requires a qualified, trained person to do all the recognition," Rajwa stated. "We want a system where you can actually put a petri dish or some other container into the system, you press enter and the computer says, 'This is salmonella of this type and this strain, ' and it does this quickly in real time. There is absolutely no fundamental reason why we wouldn't be able to do this, and we are pretty close to having an actual prototype of a product that could be commercialised."

The researchers have filed a provisional patent for the data-processing technique, and a full patent application has been filed on the underlying light-scattering technology.

Drug-resistant E. coli likely started in poultry

SOURCE: Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 1, 2006.

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The food-contaminating bug E. coli -- which can cause diarrhea, urinary tract infections and more severe illness in humans -- appears to be developing resistance to antibiotics called fluoroquinolones in chickens, a study shows.

The problem is arising largely because of antibiotic treatment of the animals, which forces the microbes to mutate and become resistant. Food-borne resistant E. coli can then be transmitted to humans.

Action to interrupt the transmission of resistant bacteria from animals to humans may become necessary, the researchers say. Such measures could include "limiting antimicrobial use in food animals, adopting more hygienic food-processing and distribution practices, irradiating food, and improving kitchen hygiene."


In the late 1990s, Dr. James R. Johnson of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and colleagues obtained E. coli from 35 blood samples and 33 fecal samples from patients with food poisoning seen at a hospital in Barcelona. The investigators also evaluated 49 fecal specimens from chickens at three slaughterhouses in the area.

They found that 30 of the human specimens and 30 of the chicken specimens were resistant to Cipro, a type of fluoroquinolone antibiotic, according to their report in The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Resistant human isolates resembled the resistant chicken isolates in terms of virulence and their DNA sequence.

"These data provide the strongest molecular evidence available to date for a food (specifically chicken) source for potentially pathogenic fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in humans," Johnson and his team write.

They emphasize that even though the resistant organisms from humans and chickens were less virulent than antibiotic-susceptible human E. coli isolates, "they are not benign." The resistant isolates are still capable of causing blood poisoning and acute urinary tract infections in humans.

Once these findings are confirmed in other studies, the researchers conclude, they will "provide a compelling rationale for efforts to eliminate such organisms from the food supply."

Drug-resistant E. coli likely started in poultry

10.jul.06
Reuters

NEW YORK - The food-contaminating bug E. coli -- which can cause diarrhea, urinary tract infections and more severe illness in humans -- appears to be developing resistance to antibiotics called fluoroquinolones in chickens, a study shows.

The problem is arising largely because of antibiotic treatment of the animals, which forces the microbes to mutate and become resistant. Food-borne resistant E. coli can then be transmitted to humans.

Action to interrupt the transmission of resistant bacteria from animals to humans may become necessary, the researchers say. Such measures could include "limiting antimicrobial use in food animals, adopting more hygienic food-processing and distribution practices, irradiating food, and improving kitchen hygiene."

In the late 1990s, Dr. James R. Johnson of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and colleagues obtained E. coli from 35 blood samples and 33 fecal samples from patients with food poisoning seen at a hospital in Barcelona. The investigators also evaluated 49 fecal specimens from chickens at three slaughterhouses in the area.

They found that 30 of the human specimens and 30 of the chicken specimens were resistant to Cipro, a type of fluoroquinolone antibiotic, according to their report in The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Resistant human isolates resembled the resistant chicken isolates in terms of virulence and their DNA sequence.

"These data provide the strongest molecular evidence available to date for a food (specifically chicken) source for potentially pathogenic fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in humans," Johnson and his team write.

They emphasize that even though the resistant organisms from humans and chickens were less virulent than antibiotic-susceptible human E. coli isolates, "they are not benign." The resistant isolates are still capable of causing blood poisoning and acute urinary tract infections in humans.

Once these findings are confirmed in other studies, the researchers conclude, they will "provide a compelling rationale for efforts to eliminate such organisms from the food supply."

SOURCE: Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 1, 2006.

Does it look cooked? A review of factors that influence cooked meat color

01.may.06
Journal of Food Science Volume 71 Issue 4 Page R31
Nicola J. King (nČe Turner) and Rosemary Whyte

ABSTRACT: Adequate cooking of meat is necessary to inactivate microbial pathogens. This is particularly important for ground meat products and some variety meats where pathogens can be present internally. Consumers are being advised on appropriate temperatures to which meat products should be cooked, and to use a meat thermometer to ensure these temperatures are reached. However, consumers are more likely to assess cooking status by the color of the meat or juice. This article reviews the factors that can influence the final color of cooked meat. In most instances, these factors influence color by modifying the meat pigment myoglobin prior to and during cooking. Many factors can prolong the pink "uncooked" color in meat, including high pH, modified atmosphere packaging, rapid thawing, low fat content, nitrite, and irradiation. Such factors may lead to overcooking and loss of food quality, and consumer rejection. Alternatively, factors that cause "premature browning" of meat, where the interior of the product looks cooked but a microbiologically safe temperature has not been reached, are food safety issues. Pale, soft exudative meats can prematurely brown, as can meats packaged under oxygenated conditions, frozen in bulk or thawed over long periods, or those that have had salts or lean finely textured beef added. Meats cooked from a frozen state or irradiated in aerobic conditions might also be at risk, but this might depend on meat species. In summary, the color of cooked meat is not a good indicator of adequate cooking, and the use of a food thermometer is recommended.